Disputes & Litigation

Turn the numbers into arguments that decide the case.

In a dispute, whoever masters the quantification sets the terms of the debate. We put financial expertise behind your strategy: a credibly quantified loss, anomalies brought to light, a demonstration a judge or arbitrator can follow — and that the other side struggles to unwind.

Present your case →

What's at stake

The questions you're asking

What is my loss really worth, and how do I make it incontestable?

How do I show what would have happened without the wrongdoing — the counterfactual?

Do the other party's accounts hide anomalies?

How do I defend the director against an action for asset insufficiency?

How do I activate a warranty claim or challenge a cash at closing?

Our role

How we create value for you

Your loss becomes a defensible figure

We build a robust assessment grounded in a solid counterfactual scenario, designed from the outset to withstand the opposing expert's counter-fire.

Damages assessment · Counterfactual

You take the upper hand in the financial debate

Customer or supplier disputes, shareholder litigation, arbitration: we translate accounting complexity into a clear, quantified, defensible narrative the court can own.

Commercial & shareholder disputes

You secure what's decided at closing

Cash at closing, preference-share waterfall, warranty claim activation: we defend, line by line, every euro that should come back to you.

Cash at closing · Waterfall · Warranty

You protect the director

Facing an action for asset insufficiency or a tax and social dispute, we underpin your defence with the accounting facts and anomaly detection.

Director defence · Anomalies

Where we step in

The situations we handle

Post-acquisition dispute Shareholder litigation Customer / supplier dispute Arbitration Asset insufficiency Tax & social dispute

Track record

Real cases, anonymised

Representative engagements from my career. Real sectors and orders of magnitude; names removed for confidentiality.

Completion cash dispute · Industry

After the sale of an industrial division, the buyer contested the completion net cash. Analysis of net cash and of the cash actually available at closing.

~€14m overstatement demonstrated

Defence against an opposing expert · Logistics

A claimant sought €6.5m based on a Big Four firm's report. Defendant-side counter-expertise and critical review of the damages methodology.

€6.5m claim contested

Damages assessment · Live events

Valuation of business opportunities a company had to turn down while mobilised on a major production. Documented, item by item.

Loss quantified and evidenced

Collective franchisee dispute · Restaurants

Defence of a franchisor facing a group of franchisees: economic and financial analysis and rebuttal of the claims.

Structured defence argument

The outcome

What you gain

A quantification that holds

A financial demonstration built to convince the judge and withstand counter-expertise.

The initiative in the debate

You set the quantified frame; it's for the other party to adapt to it.

The director protected

A defence backed by facts, not principles alone.